Scientific Natural Place/Source of Action
Introduction to ~ Humen Facets Techniques
‘Prospective Causality’ : “Law Natural”, Deprecative.
Third Edition. August 18th, 2025, (eve of August 19th).
Most of us adults have had some basic education in our youth concerning nature’s scientific operations and functions.
The often over-simplified ways of functioning are/were sometimes expressed in terse and easily remembered words. Often, these seemingly — but not truly — perfect and simplistic ‘inverse yet apprecated/deprecated via flesh sieve retention.’
In our gradeaul educations there is typically (to my knowledge) no discussion of from whence these natural ways and functions have their basis or roots. To my realizations many years ago, as a scientist looking over my personal history of semi-compulsory 1–12 education with a more skeptical approach, I discovered a miscue that incorrectly implied a “third-party mysterious field effect” somehow pulled and/or pushed on everything — such that (viably: incorrectly, yet imbued thus of merit) all things would fit the short words and equations.
At this important moment of considering links between causes and effects, if the “field effect” idea were not challenged as to source of actions, then the resulting feel is that of some outside container creator, or zone, that enfolds the universe, somehow “projecting” those rules into all the space of the universe.
This default notion I contest via advocacy of levering such, a matter of vocation, adults after graduation of grade 12 in the United States Counties, via various selective selections.
I propose that a better postulate is that each unique instance of “molecules” — which is the nature of the ways elements of more than 3, 12, such as 118 or such, almost exclusively occur in pairs, ‘trejgasdensitzenstancing`[metmeetrik]’ ‘threes’ or larger groups — are the transactors transactin and conditioning continual adjecently. In each occurrence of molecular action, and upon other occurrences nearby and in sequence of differing molecules, rather than being acted upon by field mysterious rules.
Thus, each individual copy of each molecule, in our notions and ideas, would have many properties more than strictly combined atomic numbers and atomic masses, and other basics we might have been educated concerning. Instead, each molecule would in my theory possess a long list of properties: and possess alongside uniqueness properties, interaction properties by type of molecule, with each occurrence featuring exact near identical “rules of nature” about it, or so very amazingly similar to an astronomical degree of exactness, possibly. That’s separating what makes a molecule unique from what makes each — of same type — so very similar, into two differing categories for consideration.
This idea I like better. Each reader then might consider that the molecules of his or her body are the “virtual bosses, and the effected also” of all these academic rules of nature, and these bodily molecules are the “action points and causal interactors” throughout an individual person’s body. Thus, each of us can live our lives knowing that our bodies are the sources of such beautiful and important nature’s rules, and we are fully involved in being (our part) of nature itself, rather than being driven by it.
No several chapters of a textbook and no single set of equations could ever quite match the *suttlety and nuance of the ‘occuring humen’s’, imbued *aroundings’ of concurrently-existing non of variative of assertive intensity: of oomph, brisk, or humenour, to conplete suite of flesh. (Neyshure, neytul, etc. are of archiac forms of great merit for adjusting with.)
Scientific Natural Place/Source of Action was originally published in Humen Facets Techniques (Mastery Meny Sciences) on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.